There's a great blog post by Dan Mitchell on the manufactured controversy over Indiana's law to protect religious objections here.
My quibble with Dan is the looseness allowed for determining what is "moral" and what is not:
If we abandon the traditional core principles of morality rooted in
Christian philosophy and natural law, then what determines an act or
belief to be “immoral” and how do we distinguish it from being
“unpopular” or “politically incorrect.”
I am a Roman catholic. Do I have a right to embrace our catechism
teachings developed over many centuries, or do I have to kowtow to the
prevailing elites and say I am personally offended by those who refuse
to sell their goods and services for use at gay weddings? Do I have a
right to maintain that marriage is a solemn and holy union between a man
and a woman, and dissent with those who toss centuries of Christian
philosophy aside to impose their enlightened view?
Similarly, may I continue to maintain that life is not only precious,
it is more precious and profound than we can ever know, even though the
enlightened elites insist I defer to the moral development of those
with wombs, or those who administer death row justice, or those who
allocate funds for medicare purposes and thus hold life and death power
over their supplicants?
This new tactic of imposed orthodoxy in the name of tolerance is not
about moral formation (or tolerance), it’s about fascist control.
“Immoral” is becoming the label associated with those who resist the
Regime’s dictates in some way. It is so intellectually shallow, but the
prevailing dearth of critical thinking in the electorate not only makes
it possible, it allows the fascism to thrive.
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Saturday, March 7, 2015
Dissing Duggars - because they threaten so
In her great post at http://neoneocon.com/2015/02/05/sex-and-the-duggars-the-fundamentalist-christian-vs-the-liberals/ neo-neocon asks:
Does the opposite—engaging in uncommitted sex with perfect “freedom”—invariably make people sexually happy?Great topic. In the Duggar example, are they servants to sexdrive, or does sexdrive serve them . . . and serve their vision for cultivating family in a troubled world? I don’t think the answer is confined to measures of happiness; it needs to extend into endurance measures of marriage and of grandparent, parent, child and sibling relationships.
And the answer needs to evaluate the notion of freedom. I wonder if the compelling need to ridicule the Duggars is a mechanism to keep masking the inner truth about how manipulated and confined we are by our unlimited license for sexual indulgence.
Musings on Disqus II
Discussion on
National Review Online
786 comments
Trigonometry Is Racist!
Discussion on
The American Spectator
320 comments
Mitch McConnell Caves
Let's keep in mind that Mitch McConnell is a supremely able chess
player -- my guess is he didn't have the votes to make a cloture change
due to timid forces in his own party.
When the Left didn't like the cloture rule for non-SCOTUS judicial
appointments, they just changed it. If there was a resulting "nuclear"
fallout, the Washington Press failed to report it. I don't see why the
Right could not remove the cloture rule for funding blockages that
result in shutdown. Let the Left squeal -- like the unionists did at
the Wisconsin Capitol building 4 years ago; it's what they do and we
need to be enacting policy that makes them do it more often.
Discussion on
National Review Online
326 comments
The Shiny-Object Fallacy
Great article, KW is an unrelenting prophet on each of the thousand
cuts exsanguinating the American experiment. Kevin's takeaway line is
below -- but I would like to think there is some tangible preparation
each of us can build upon to better deal with the growing collapse of
order and integrity.
"The Hatch Act of 1939, passed in the wake of a scandal that
involved the Democratic party’s using WPA employees as de facto campaign
workers and swapping WPA jobs and patronage for political
contributions, is supposed to criminalize that sort of thing. But in the
broadest sense, using government resources to further individual
political interests is impossible to police — instead, we are dependent
upon the prudence and probity of our elected officials and the people
they appoint, which is another way of saying we are , insofar as this
matter is concerned, screwed ."
"The Hatch Act of 1939, passed in the wake of a scandal that
involved the Democratic party’s using WPA employees as de facto campaign
workers and swapping WPA jobs and patronage for political
contributions, is supposed to criminalize that sort of thing. But in the
broadest sense, using government resources to further individual
political interests is impossible to police — instead, we are dependent
upon the prudence and probity of our elected officials and the people
they appoint, which is another way of saying we are , insofar as this
matter is concerned, screwed ."
Discussion on
American Thinker
252 comments
God Save Us From The Churches
I am all for finding more Christian unity, but ripping Dr. Shaw, a
person I don't know, isn't unifying. If the author represented a
majority of the Board of Trustees for Stanford, I could understand his
insertion into Dr. Shaw's affairs. Unlike the author, I will not
suggest that Stanford consider my views on the reported policies of
their Dean for Religious Life. Unusual? Yes. My business? No.
Amazon’s Double Standard on Marriage
Orthodoxy is not something agreed upon, rather, it is something
compelled. And compelling views to the contrary are snuffed out to make
it seem like they were never spoken in the first place. But it's not
just Amazon; Ed Morrissey of TheWeek/Hotair, John Hinderacker of
Powerline, Clarice Feldman of American Thinker and Michael Walsh of PJ
Media all do the same thing.
Discussion on
National Review Online
15 comments
Hats off to KW for a great title, and content that delivers. His
articles are well selected protests harkening back to a Hank Rearden
resisting group think intimidations designed to extract his personal
surrender. Hank called them self-immolations; they are all over the
place now. Parents surrender on child-rearing, teachers on student
performance, employers on worker dedication, and citizens on leader
integrity. Kevin's article notes a self-imposed extra accountability
for those of us in the race/gender/orientation/religion currently out of
vogue. Wow, it's as if the Atlas on which the entire planet is moored .
. . has just Shrugged!
Discussion on
National Review Online
2399 comments
Horse Pucky from Obama
Perhaps we can all agree that historically, Islam has been a religion of
Pax Mortis. That is, peace through human slaughter and subjugation.
And sadly, today's Islam seems to put no enlightened distance on that
history whatsoever.
Pax Mortis. That is, peace through human slaughter and subjugation.
And sadly, today's Islam seems to put no enlightened distance on that
history whatsoever.
The Anti-Science Left
I'll thank Ian Tuttle to refrain from directing the health care of any
lives other than his own. My experience rejects Mr. Tuttle's rigidity
and affirms the advice of Dr. Bernie Siegel in his 1988 classic: Love,
Medicine and Miracles. For example, I fully endorse the effectiveness
of the homeopathic remedy called Zi-Cam and I have used chiropractors
and flower essences. Being a conservative, do I get a pass, or will Ian
Tuttle's compassion-free mob expediently dispatch me as leftist
anyway?
lives other than his own. My experience rejects Mr. Tuttle's rigidity
and affirms the advice of Dr. Bernie Siegel in his 1988 classic: Love,
Medicine and Miracles. For example, I fully endorse the effectiveness
of the homeopathic remedy called Zi-Cam and I have used chiropractors
and flower essences. Being a conservative, do I get a pass, or will Ian
Tuttle's compassion-free mob expediently dispatch me as leftist
anyway?
Knoxious
JG and Earick both have valid points. The Right should engage the
broader culture -- but if we were to welcome the endorsement of Bill
Cosby, for example, how do we not end up providing a reciprocal
endorsement to the acts attributed to him? It's true that young people
need guidance, and it is media figures like John Stewart and Lena Dunham
who not only draw them in, but act as catalysts in spurning the mature
voices of traditional wisdom.
Kevin had is way with Lena, and it was important to challenge what
Lena published. But I agree with you retiredfire, why should Kevin even
care what this odd Duke sophomore has to say (and appear to be in a
personal War on [daft] Women)? Still, this line by Kevin has me
rotflmao: "If you’ve attended very many libertarian conferences, you
know that
virginity and libertarianism very often go hand-in-hand, though not
always willingly."
virginity and libertarianism very often go hand-in-hand, though not
always willingly."
About That 20-Week Abortion Bill
Abortion policy is only personal for the womb owner, and for males
like you Kevin . . . well, proponents just summon all the indignation
they can muster and darkly refuse to recognize you -- or to recognize
how much more personal it is for you than the womb owner. It would be
profoundly recognized if the law evicted unwanted tenants with the same
dispatch. Today's clingers to human dignity are labeled annoying and
offensive -- if we were more popular, maybe the House would not have
rescinded its recognition; they clearly do not have a lapidarian
precision on when the unborn are entitled to protection.
Time for the 0–10–100 Tax
Great comments, but as I read the plan, businesses will pay a flat
ten percent on revenue and will no longer pay the huge social security
and medicare they kick in now. Low margin businesses would have to
restructure and reselling activities would be severely curtailed. This
shakeout is a concern, but the 10/10/100 plan is worth looking at --
still I doubt that politicos can resist the temptation to eliminate
special interest exemptions.
There is no love in a beheading
Well this post certainly brings out the worst of us. Islam has
confounded the Christian world for centuries -- but we might remember
that until the 1900s, the Jews of the world found Islamic rule far more
tolerant than rule by Christians. Today's torture, rape, murder and
beheadings by barbarians touting Islam were not prominent when the
Ottoman e
mpire dominated part of the world. But that empire is so long gone that there is not even a memory of how the Muslim world deferred to its far more dignified leadership. What is left are fanatics deploying shock and horror to gain attention and dominate destitute territory. And America's deployment of shock and horror drone strikes on villages that may harbor these fanatics tends to exacerbate the subhuman tactics we deplore. We are in for a long slog.
mpire dominated part of the world. But that empire is so long gone that there is not even a memory of how the Muslim world deferred to its far more dignified leadership. What is left are fanatics deploying shock and horror to gain attention and dominate destitute territory. And America's deployment of shock and horror drone strikes on villages that may harbor these fanatics tends to exacerbate the subhuman tactics we deplore. We are in for a long slog.
Discussion on
National Review Online
1335 comments
The Catholic Weakness A large proportion of traditional, Mass-going Catholics don’t be…
"Catholics are abysmally catechized" -- maybe so. I spent 11 years
catechizing PSR kids on old testament stories and didn't see much
capacity for absorbing or even welcoming the mystery of God working in
human history. It's not a malicious or evil thing, it's an absence of
wonder. Our TV, internet, smart phones, and video games comfort
instantly; they reinforce both a disconnect from everything that came
before, and a compulsion to be on top of whatever is the latest in pop
culture. I would suggest more delayed gratification -- but today's
minds have no way of grasping what that could possibly be.
The U.S. Bows Down to a Group of Anonymous Norks
Sony needs to be creative here. First, reschedule the release for
Independence Day and publicly refuse to be humbled by the threats.
Second, saturate South Korea TV with ads promoting the movie. Third,
make sure copies are available in China for massive pirating. Fourth,
rather than release the movie in theaters, surprise Americans with a
free July 4th broadcast on pay per view.
Terror threat cancels movie premiere
Exactly. Sony needs to be creative here. First, reschedule the
release for Independence Day and publicly refuse to be humbled by the
threats. Second, saturate South Korea TV with ads promoting the movie.
Third, make sure copies are available in China for massive pirating.
Fourth, rather than release the movie in theaters, surprise Americans
with a free July 4th broadcast on pay per view.
We Need You
I thought I'd respond by buying the digital subscription, but even
with the subscription, my online experience remains the same TSA-like
interaction with unwanted popups and forever loading flash ads. Hey
Jonah, is there a National Review online subscription available that
upgrades me to clean, fresh, ad-free access to NR's online horde of
wisdom? Stroke my ego and call it a Digital VIP subscription.
INVESTIGATION: Lena Dunham ‘Raped by a Republican’ Story in Bestseller Collapses…
To defend his good name, Barry One has a legal defense fund at http://www.gofundme.com/ib59bo . Perhaps Lena and her publisher will regret generating profitable publicity by malicious lies and smears.
Discussion on
American Thinker
200 comments
The Million Man Cigarette and Salt March
So how do we translate the week's events into something more than
self deluding put-downs of those with misguided views? How have
conservatives and conservative principles made positive improvements in
peoples lives -- because I fail to see how Clarice's glib indulgence in
schadenfruede makes conservatism appealing to anyone.
Discussion on
National Review Online
892 comments
Black Lives Matter
I suggest the black pastor's reflection here: http://www.thegospelcoalition....
About 2 years ago I was in my car waiting at a light near a predominantly black apartment complex. A white boy of about 16 walked by and literally 40 black youths poured into the street to punch and kick the boy. The light turned green and I drove toward the action and those youths slipped away and disappeared into their apartments as gracefully as a cloud casts a moving shadow. The boy got up and left the area and when I inquired he did not seek my assistance.
With all due respect to Kevin, this is not about having the more persuasive argument or the more effective policy. This is about a fatherless mob exploiting opportunity and feigning indignation. To the extent we have a mainstream community rooted in character, integrity, morality and law, let's stop assuming that this fatherless mob and its supporters want to live in such a community.
About 2 years ago I was in my car waiting at a light near a predominantly black apartment complex. A white boy of about 16 walked by and literally 40 black youths poured into the street to punch and kick the boy. The light turned green and I drove toward the action and those youths slipped away and disappeared into their apartments as gracefully as a cloud casts a moving shadow. The boy got up and left the area and when I inquired he did not seek my assistance.
With all due respect to Kevin, this is not about having the more persuasive argument or the more effective policy. This is about a fatherless mob exploiting opportunity and feigning indignation. To the extent we have a mainstream community rooted in character, integrity, morality and law, let's stop assuming that this fatherless mob and its supporters want to live in such a community.
Yes. That movie was an attack on legitimate parenting instincts to
protect an extremely naive and underskilled 19 year old, and it deemed
those instincts to be rooted in racial prejudice and bigotry. The movie
made it plainly clear that of the two errors: a) do nothing as your
beloved daughter is led by strangers down a path filled with worry and
danger; or b) appear to take action that could possibly have, among its
many motivations, a bigoted one --- the second error was the far
greater sin.
How to Check the President
Newt passed a budget that clipped Clinton's spending ambitions,
Clinton vetoed it and the ensuing public relations battle enormously
boosted Clinton's standing while the GOP was devastatingly branded as
the party of shutdown. The House GOP did it again in 2013 and, for a
time, boosted a paralyzed Obama. In both cases, the GOP completely
capitulated on budget legislation to get government open again.
Shutdown is the strategy of a party desperately seeking the contempt and
distrust of the electorate. Before embracing shutdown as a viable
choice, find out how many battleground elections were won by a
republican vowing to shut down government to curtail the President, and
predict how many of the 24 GOP senators up for re-election in 2016 will
support shutdown over the next 2 years.
So, given the weak choices offered by the authors, this article essentially suggests that the only way to check this President is to bring a plastic spoon to a knife fight.
I suggest 2 better choices, 1) a relentless public relations campaign
with Daniel Hannan espousing the virtues of integrity, consistency and
transparency in both government and in press reporting on government,
and 2) commencing the petition to have the States call for a
constitutional convention. Every time the POTUS goes lawless cowboy,
get a State to sign the petition.
Is Jonathan Gruber a Michael Mann without academic freedom defense?
A great post. I wondered if Gruber faced a false claims exposure.
Protestants Should Heed the Pope This Week
I commend Mark Tooley's post and would encourage reflection on both
the nature of the male/female relationship and the millennia of
tradition as to the procreative ideal for the husband and wife
relationship. One important aspect of the tradition formerly passed
from generation to generation was the expectation that a) the adults
would sacrifice their needs for the needs of their children, and b) a
key need of children was a stable, respectful, and committed
relationship between mother and father. Clearly we have drifted to a
tradition that expects the vulnerable children to suck up the
disruptions inherent in an anything goes series of relationships that
resemble recreational experiments. The whimsical desires of parents
trump the the needs of the children, and no social construct reprimands
or discourages that posture.
Obamacare Facebook page full of Astroturfed comments
Great report. Perhaps it will lead to a policy of not allowing AT
authors from spiking sufficiently respectful comments that challenge
their posts.
Ukrainian Lessons for the West
George Weigel's piece is a spectacular blueprint for putting a nation
back on course. Perhaps he can supplement it with more detail on the
missing de-legitimatizations. If nothing else, it can serve as a quite
useful future treasure to be unearthed much like the portrayal in A
CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ. This society of increasing fatherlessness and
increasing matriarchy tends to determine that there is nothing worth
fighting for.
In the US we seem to be 300 million frogs obliviously swimming in a
warming pot. A few are alert enough to know what is coming -- but will
we be able to find and organize enough of them to implement what George
calls for and reverse course? Our comforts and petty squabbles shrink
us from even being willing to ask what past disciplines made today's
life possible, or what our resistance to discipline will render for the
next generation.
Thank You, Jonathan Gruber
Discussion on
National Review Online
517 comments
An excellent post by Rich. So succinct even non-MIT types like me could comprehend it in one try.
The Pope’s Unforced Error
Actually, there already is an established practice of provisional or
conditional baptism. One would think a provisional annulment could be
established while there are minor children in the home and the parent
performs on a commitment to keep up with catechism and the sacraments.
Our church has a long history of clergy and even popes keeping
concubines and fathering children and still validly administering their
office despite the public scandal. The beneficial mercy I suggest is
not outweighed by the risk of the Church and its authority being
scandalized by remarried Catholics devoting themselves more fully to the
faith under the indulgence of a provisional annulment.
The prodigal's brother again fails to see the obvious. If the
remarried custodial parent lapses from attending Mass and belonging to a
parish, then the children are highly likely to follow suit.
Cardinal Burke has a stunning intellect and is quite eloquent in both
spoken and written word. And he is correct about traditional Church
doctrine and discipline regarding remarried Catholics and gay Catholics.
He was also correct to challenge the bolshevik tactics at the recent
synod which departed from confidential exchanges and issued a radical,
single view press release suggesting synod support for major changes.
However, I am not sure that the Cardinal is ever persuaded to views other than his own. He had a reputation as an autocrat when he was Bishop of La Crosse, WI and of St. Louis.
With respect to remarried Catholics, perhaps the great minds of the Church can work out a revised sanction which allows some kind of provisional access to the sacraments for the sake of minor children of the marriage, so that THEY have continued access to the sacraments. It was disappointing that the ubiquitous gay agenda emerged to consume almost all the oxygen for the synod and seek to twist Church doctrine to better conform with prevailing political movements.
However, I am not sure that the Cardinal is ever persuaded to views other than his own. He had a reputation as an autocrat when he was Bishop of La Crosse, WI and of St. Louis.
With respect to remarried Catholics, perhaps the great minds of the Church can work out a revised sanction which allows some kind of provisional access to the sacraments for the sake of minor children of the marriage, so that THEY have continued access to the sacraments. It was disappointing that the ubiquitous gay agenda emerged to consume almost all the oxygen for the synod and seek to twist Church doctrine to better conform with prevailing political movements.
Inside the Plan to Block Obama's Executive Amnesty
Dem support for Obama and the Dem leadership is weak. It's a good
time to peel away sensible democrats to support sensible bills. Then
let's see if POTUS has the balls to veto bills with bipartisan support
and then withstand further decline in approval. What he wants is the
fierce partisan fight you describe Mike, because the fight ends with his
veto and his power prevails over the GOP. On the other hand, vetoes of
bipartisan bills will look like an abuse of power.
Smart ways to fight back: The GOP makes the legislative rules and
committee assignments, it's not subject to a veto or a 60 vote cloture
-- so exploit those unilateral posturing opportunities. No doubt some
members on the Left will have useful insights on a portion of the needed
corrections. Display efforts to "get along" by setting up new rules
that give selected members of the minority a chance to participate.
Perhaps each chair can have discretion to create the position of
"opposition consigliere" as a consultant to help advise on legislation
to have better opportunities for getting some endorsement votes from the
Left. These would be people serving at the pleasure of the chair --
NOT Reid/Pelosi or the ranking member, it's not like the leadership is
held in high regard by rank and file dems anyway -- and actions by the
dem leadership that blocks or punishes the consigliere can be made to
look like ugly partisanship in the press.
.
Next, create substantial but discretionary privileges for the minority that are contingent on the President's good behavior and are diminished each time the President unlawfully bypasses Congress or disregards the law. The GOP can't punish the President, but it can punish members of his party and they will be better positioned to prevent or punish his misconduct.
.
Third, the dems already adopted the "nuclear" option on judicial appointees (except for SCOTUS). Perhaps the Senate can pass a contingent rule that triggers the full nuclear option (even for Scotus) in the event of Presidential misconduct like exceeding his authority on immigration or on Obamacare.
.
Fourth, set up an 18 month select committee to investigate and hold hearings on the insidious Administration practice of promising full cooperation with Congressional inquiry and then lying, deceiving, hiding, losing and stonewalling on documents and testimony. Included in the scope would be mistreatment of journalists like James Rosen, Stephen F. Hayes and Sharyl Attkisson.
.
Lastly, work on legislation that really helps -- and find ways to get similar bills enacted in GOP States. When Obama vetoes those bills, show the benefit derived in those States and denounce Obama for blocking progress.
.
Next, create substantial but discretionary privileges for the minority that are contingent on the President's good behavior and are diminished each time the President unlawfully bypasses Congress or disregards the law. The GOP can't punish the President, but it can punish members of his party and they will be better positioned to prevent or punish his misconduct.
.
Third, the dems already adopted the "nuclear" option on judicial appointees (except for SCOTUS). Perhaps the Senate can pass a contingent rule that triggers the full nuclear option (even for Scotus) in the event of Presidential misconduct like exceeding his authority on immigration or on Obamacare.
.
Fourth, set up an 18 month select committee to investigate and hold hearings on the insidious Administration practice of promising full cooperation with Congressional inquiry and then lying, deceiving, hiding, losing and stonewalling on documents and testimony. Included in the scope would be mistreatment of journalists like James Rosen, Stephen F. Hayes and Sharyl Attkisson.
.
Lastly, work on legislation that really helps -- and find ways to get similar bills enacted in GOP States. When Obama vetoes those bills, show the benefit derived in those States and denounce Obama for blocking progress.
The biggest mistake the GOP can make is to let themselves be yet
again branded the party of government shutdown. The best way to avoid
this is refusing to play the shutdown card because Obama will benefit
from calling the bluff (as the Ted Cruz republicans were schooled
earlier -- just like the Gingrich republicans in the 90's). There are
smarter ways to fight back.
Texas Cities are Losing Control of Fracking
A primary issue in Denton, and many other parts of Texas, is
protecting scarce water supplies. I am all for developing oil and gas,
but not in urban areas and not near water supplies. All the people who
want to dismiss this protest as over-reaching tree hugging should put
their money where there mouths are, buy a discounted home in the
affected Denton areas, and try raising children there. Be sure to
research the purchase by reading the local comments at http://www.dentonrc.com/local-...
Discussion on
National Review Online
36 comments
Dispatch from the Future
Perhaps the piece will help the Left see the possible consequences of
their practice of policy implementations that greatly exceed the
boundaries of their authority. But this cuts both ways, the Left may
become excited about the prospects of executive orders compelling 80%
withholdings on the salaries of the rich, and 0% withholding on the
working poor. The Obama era has reinforced a Leftist delusion that they
can always pay for their agenda with printed dollars when tax receipts
aren't enough.
It’s How They Wrote the Law
My hope is that Chief Justice Roberts comes to his senses,
reconsiders his prior opinion, and strikes down the law on
constitutional grounds. That is a far better solution for all
concerned. Gutting the practice of federal subsidies creates a disaster
for both right and left. Given that, my educated guess is this:
Roberts will double down and announce that his superior intellect
perceives penumbras in the law which authorize the federal subsidies.
It's his only option if he wants to keep his landmark opinion on
Obamacare constitutionality relevant.
Wind turbines declared health hazard in Wisconsin
Great report from Thomas/Clarice. Left and Right are so conditioned
to stick to their orthodoxy regardless of the human consequences. This
is only one county among the several thousand counties in the US, but
it's nice to see critical thinking trump ideology at least once.
I'm no expert, but I know that low frequency base thumping from car stereos agitates intensely.
The Left and Lena Dunham
Interesting theory on purges among the left. Eliot Spitzer had a sex
scandal about sex, but he had single-handedly made so many enemies that
the scandal gave pols full cover in withdrawing support. Bill
Clinton's sex scandal was about lying under oath before a federal judge,
but the left turned it into an over-reaching Ken Starr snooping into
understandable fibs about an irrelevant affair; Clinton held on to his
political and media support. His well documented war on women is
somehow absolved -- apparently because his politics are correct.
Outrageous 'John Doe' prosecution of Scott Walker supporters in Wisconsin ends
It is good that Thomas Lifson is highlighting this problem. An
enormous amount of trust and discretion is given to prosecutors with no
system of accountability. Prosecutors need to be people of integrity
who are interested in strengthening the fabric of our society -- but our
system rewards them with higher office for the scalps they succeed at
taking unscrupulously.
Discussion on
National Review Online
746 comments
Brittany Maynard’s Death
Very thoughtful comments. Do you have insight as to options with
sedatives and pain meds? I know increasing dosages of morphine can lead
to death of the patient, but it is administered in stages to provide
comfort, not to stop the heart. Does the Oregon shortcut really
provide dignity not available elsewhere?
I suggest we charitably remember that the most vigorous of non-believers was Saul of Tarsus.
Chuck's argument is perhaps more persuasive against himself rather than against Kevin. A staunch devotion to atheism does not purify reason, it brings its own dark bias as to why we are here. And that devotion to atheism begs the question: why is Chuck here? . . . That is, why is Chuck at a publication founded by a monumental intellect who was a devoted believer. And If Kevin's reasoning falls because of Christian faith, so does Buckley's, and Reagan's and even the reasoning of America's founding fathers.
Chuck's argument is perhaps more persuasive against himself rather than against Kevin. A staunch devotion to atheism does not purify reason, it brings its own dark bias as to why we are here. And that devotion to atheism begs the question: why is Chuck here? . . . That is, why is Chuck at a publication founded by a monumental intellect who was a devoted believer. And If Kevin's reasoning falls because of Christian faith, so does Buckley's, and Reagan's and even the reasoning of America's founding fathers.
As Walter Miller's A CANTICLE FOR LEIBOWITZ nears its end, state
sponsored euthanasia tents are erected near monastery grounds due to
widespread radiation sickness and despair. The abbot tries vigorously
to steer the despairing away from the state facilities. Shortly
thereafter, he is dying from a nuclear bomb shock wave, and he ponders
the life of an infant who he knows to be marching into euthanasia with
her despairing mother. As the abbot fights off crippling pain and bouts
of unconsciousness, he uses his last energy to prayerfully carry as
much suffering as he possibly can, so as to reduce the burdens heaped on
that innocent, trusting infant.
Ms. Maynard made a choice, but the abbot offers a different choice, much like our Lord who persevered through the fears faced at Gethsemane; He chose to carry monumental suffering in order to conquer the dark grip of death and redeem us back to the Giver of our lives. One would hope that Christians would do all in their power to bring aid to the afflicted, and simultaneously do all in their power to prevent substituting that aid with euthanasia.
Ms. Maynard made a choice, but the abbot offers a different choice, much like our Lord who persevered through the fears faced at Gethsemane; He chose to carry monumental suffering in order to conquer the dark grip of death and redeem us back to the Giver of our lives. One would hope that Christians would do all in their power to bring aid to the afflicted, and simultaneously do all in their power to prevent substituting that aid with euthanasia.
An FBI October surprise dirty trick in South Dakota Senate race?
"So if I suspect the DoJ's FBI of blatant interference in an eleciton to favor the Demcorats, perhaps I can be forgiven."
Pretty soon you'll be telling us that this Admin shamelessly lied about Benghazi failures and coordinated unlawful IRS harassment of conservative nonprofits to avoid a 2012 election setback.
Pretty soon you'll be telling us that this Admin shamelessly lied about Benghazi failures and coordinated unlawful IRS harassment of conservative nonprofits to avoid a 2012 election setback.
Health-Care Hell
Witness the astonishing arrogance of the Left, but when will the
electorate hold them accountable? My guess is for only this election
cycle, during which the Right will pass legislation to repair the
damage, a grand compromise between establishment republicans and the
President will gut the repair, and thereafter the Left will successfully
blame the Right for the country's health insurance problems. It's just
a guess.
Dysfunctional Disability Judges
Why else would the most anti-transparent administration in history be
packing the appellate courts under senate leader Harry "Dr.
Strangelove" Reid who has learned to stop worrying and love the nuclear
option. This regime knows Jillian and her ilk will be coming with
appeals, and it needs the votes to withstand their legitimate pleas for
disclosure.
Pathetic Privilege
Some of us grew up with June and Ward Cleaver's rather rigid but
clear sense of propriety. However, the social signals abruptly shifted
to embrace Norman Lear's steep and slippery slope away from the earlier
norm. TV dictates a propriety and society acquiesces in the decline. I
suppose it's appropriate to single out this woman to cry out in
disgust, but Kevin's derision is not likely to erode the strange pride
she has in being this way -- or in media's willingness to saturate us
with more celebrations of polymorphous perversion.
Yoga, Door to Transcendental Meditation and Demonic Possession
There is a powerful reality beyond what we casually see, touch, hear,
smell or taste. And we probably have just a small inkling of how our
formation as children dominates our subconscious and sways the choices
we think we make rationally. I dabbled in yoga briefly and have
profound respect for how the postures become so ingrained in the body
that the mind both welcomes and yields to them. We think of new age as
having an image of universal good will; yet it is always about
developing self and always about deactivating how we let our neighbor's
concerns come inside. It is totally incompatible with a Christian life
of having Jesus dwell in me while I dwell in the Body of Christ. New
age thinking is a prime culprit in today's moral relativism that makes
it fashionable to be proud of pro-choice logic, proud of legally
sanctioned suicide, proud of terrifying drone strikes to fight terror,
and proud of anything goes intimacies that fill the world with
unfathered children who will build on the oppressive majority that
insists on truth being relative.
How to Secede in Business
Before we embrace the elixir of NGO activism, we might want to face
the fact that liberals almost always end up in permanent dominance of
these entities. Look at the Pew Foundation, the American Bar
Association, and almost the entire universe of academia. Allan Bloom
decried the shift in his 1987 book THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND.
What will stop NAARP from morphing into another puppet of CAIR (Council
on American-Islamic Relations)? Until it was co-opted by government
subsidies, AARP represented retired people -- now it sides with death
panel Obamacare. Saul Alinsky would probably agree that the easiest
thing to turn is a nonprofit organization, it just takes some focused
deceit.
Meet the New Serfs: You
Kevin's polymath command is astounding. But as he shares more and
more, confidence wanes as to whether we can ever restore the nation that
was once called a shining city on a hill.
Ruins of the Middle East
The even worse news is that the USA will be seen as structurally
incapable of being reliable as an ally, friend or even stabilizing
presence for much longer than a news cycle. The left seems incapable of
formulating a coherent, long term policy to serve USA interests, and
the right is helpless as electoral tides glibly eviscerate the policies
they crafted to serve American interests; further, the dismantlers do so with a certainty that
they not only will they never be held to account for the resulting
disaster -- THEY will prosper from it at the nation's expense.
The Great Catholic Cave-In that Wasn’t
Thank you George for publishing something of prominence to
countermand the Der Tag narrative so craved by the prevailing hedonism.
Still, one wonders why the Vatican does not do more to pre-empt these
reckless distortions.
Kevin Williamson and a Painful Truth
The author's reflection on crime, denial and equilibrium is
intriguing. The dichotomy about men being prosecuted for injury to
infants is not the point. The prospective mother has a conflict of
interest in the abortion decision, and the law shockingly makes no
provision for the interests of the the child to be represented. For
live children, the law calls for a guardian ad litem, but for unborn
children who are even more dependent and vulnerable, there is nothing.
For a short piece on the history of abortion as a crime is found here: http://www.missourilife.org/la....
They Are Coming for Your Children
Yes, the toxic bureaucrats strike again. Since 1960 public schools
have provided enormous additional benefit to only one group: the adults
employed there. See the Harvard and Stanford experts on the subject at
Uncommon Knowledge https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
How Liberals Dominate the Public Debate
A former journalism undergrad recently commented on how the
department declared itself to be objective, and yet was amazingly
uniform in portraying events as favorable or unfavorable. In short,
there is no getting through to journalism's gatekeepers with sound
conservative policy or with even-handed treatment. So the slogans are
only a symptom, and if the Right mixes up the game with new slogans, the
gatekeepers will adjust and resume the dominance. Perhaps the answer is
to talk far less and only debate when a Daniel Hannan type moderator is
on hand. In the meantime, conservatives are free to be more points of
light, just jump into areas of need and produce results.
The Science Is Settled: Fracking Is Safe
People need to appreciate the gigantic mess you have on hand with oil
and gas well fields. And with fracking, there are huge supplies of
toxic liquid brought to the site. Yes methane and other hydrocarbons
can release from natural processes and our environment survives --- but I
don't see any commenters willing to have their children's water supply
bubbling up with methane. How many are signing up to trade places with
people suffering under the "subset" of problems in PA and TX? The
technology can't stop natural gas rising up from the outside of well
pipes. The outside of the pipe can be sealed with cement at the
surface, but over time the cement cracks and the seals fail. Plus,
fracking's horizontal routes make it impossible to know how many other
vertical routes are bubbling up. I favor oil and gas exploration, but
I'm not for boring near water supplies or under residential areas.
Pete Rozelle to Roger Goodell
"Not the loveliest of our fellow countrymen become" . . .
movie stars, rap artists, celebrity musicians, politicians, or journalists, yet we let them rule over our steep descent into moral relativism. How fitting for them to throw the spotlight upon and lucify the incredibly few incidents of misbehavior among professional athletes. And how fitting that our priority is to "clean up" the NFL rather than vet the cultural elites. We seem to have no problem with going through the private email and voice mail of NBA executives, when do the elites grant us access to theirs?
movie stars, rap artists, celebrity musicians, politicians, or journalists, yet we let them rule over our steep descent into moral relativism. How fitting for them to throw the spotlight upon and lucify the incredibly few incidents of misbehavior among professional athletes. And how fitting that our priority is to "clean up" the NFL rather than vet the cultural elites. We seem to have no problem with going through the private email and voice mail of NBA executives, when do the elites grant us access to theirs?
Don't Blame the NFL
Let's not relegate football down to some affirmative action program
that provides the rudiments of structure and discipline for troubled
males. Life is messy and filled with competitors and bullies looking to
take your opportunities for themselves. Football captures this reality
this for young men, and instills strength, initiative, assertiveness,
determination, discipline, respect, esteem, teamwork, a sense of
belonging to something bigger than the individual self and a structure
for dealing with defeat. Football is one of the few great endeavors
that teaches how a man, despite all his shortcomings, can be a more
effective man. Football has never been about being a blemish-free Eagle
Scout.
Global Warming and the Feynman test
This article is an excellent combination of facts and balance.
Scientists seem to have self-appointed as theocratic messiahs conspiring
to save the world from a warming apocalypse. Are they not shocked by
their religious zeal and their contamination of science? Obviously
their faith trumps their integrity. In my faith, the imperative is NOT
to bear false witness.
Let Me Get This Straight
I remember being taught in college English about Marshall McLuhan
announcing that the medium is the message. When print was all we had, a
level of critical thinking was required to be apprised of local,
national and world events. Today's sewage-like gush of steering
distortions we call news are so easily taken in that critical thinking
is optional. No longer is there a reflective pause like there was
between morning papers; today's news is unceasing and it relentlessly
conditions us toward cynicism and nihilism. If we can only have one set
of warning labels in today's world, take them off the cigarettes and
put them on the news.
Surprised by Joy
This life is about taking our infirmities and making something noble
with them. It is precisely the imperfections that unleash abilities to
reach levels of grace and dignity that were seemingly impossible. Yet
so many thinkers are plagued with the deluded temptation to know better
than our Creator and snuff out lives that are not sufficiently
appealing. The mounting horror is that this Dawkins mindset marries in
so well with single payer health care allocators. These carefully
selected appointees will no doubt will strip all notions of Church in a
blind allegiance to an atheist State. Orwell seems to be saying "hello"
louder and louder every day.
ISIS Horrors and Just War Teaching
There is no question that the ISIS atrocities have to be stopped.
Even from a Christian point of view, military containment and
confrontation is not off the table, much to Mr. Tooley's obsessed
delight. But is there a way for Western Christians living in safety and
comfort to at least offer our homes as refuge for the children of these
front line Christians? How can each of us move from self-soothing
banter to sharing the burdens of our Christian brethren and taking
constructive action?
41 American Anglican Bishops Stand in Solidarity with Persecuted Believers
This is a great first step, but while our government is being
lobbied, can't we lobby ourselves? Is there a US parish to Mideast
parish support program? Should we as individuals offer our homes as
shelter?
Benghazi Constructs
Apparently, the precious value of life, of honor and of integrity are
not nearly as precious as the need to hold on to power. Perhaps the
Benghazi hearings and the 2016 electorate will adjust those
calculations.
The Narcissistic Creed
Scary good observations Mr. Williamson. Thirty years ago my mentor
at college (he was a 40 year old PhD student in counseling psychology)
would lament the explosion of polymorphous perverts (his word for navel
gazing narcissists) -- of course Bishop Berkeley had him beat by 250
years. This would seem to be a mushrooming development joined with the
great mushrooming of media in our lifetimes. It is so hard to perceive
oneself as relevant in a world of information overload overwhelmed
within a much larger universe of misinformation overload. The delusion
of relevance in posting (or even "liking") a worded selfie has an
obvious appeal.
The scary tipping point is that our LEADERS prefer the same indulgence rather than being held accountable for the presence or absence of effective action. For today's leaders, being perceived as concerned and "hip" trumps substance. I love the admonition to suggest that the selfie lot should consider abstaining from the vote. It is not naive to at least propose that the nobler posture is to recognize what you don't know and to do no harm. There really isn't much historical precedent for it in American politics, but this connected age may be the one that is positioned to see the merit. Perhaps first we'll need to restore an inclination to read 1700 word articles to the poignant end.
The scary tipping point is that our LEADERS prefer the same indulgence rather than being held accountable for the presence or absence of effective action. For today's leaders, being perceived as concerned and "hip" trumps substance. I love the admonition to suggest that the selfie lot should consider abstaining from the vote. It is not naive to at least propose that the nobler posture is to recognize what you don't know and to do no harm. There really isn't much historical precedent for it in American politics, but this connected age may be the one that is positioned to see the merit. Perhaps first we'll need to restore an inclination to read 1700 word articles to the poignant end.
The Emerging Junta
If the dominant media doesn't align to condemn the act, then only a
few of us Hortons hear the Who. The only way to hold the federal
government in check with a functioning free press is to put in
republican governments. Such a press screamed bloody murder when Bush
replaced 7 of his 93 US Attorneys after the 2006 midterm elections --
yet where are they today with this infinitely more serious abuse of
power?
Obama’s War on Louisiana
If only the Obama administration was caught closing a lane on a bridge, THEN we would have a real scandal!
Many thanks to Quinn for highlighting Gov. Jindal. The real substance of the story is not the Obama roadblocks, it is conservatives in Louisiana doing great things to help people in their state. This is the kind of branding that, if emphasized, will win over independents everywhere.
Many thanks to Quinn for highlighting Gov. Jindal. The real substance of the story is not the Obama roadblocks, it is conservatives in Louisiana doing great things to help people in their state. This is the kind of branding that, if emphasized, will win over independents everywhere.
Time to Mount the Academic Ramparts, Clean House, and Free the Serfs
One thumb up. This post has a small hint of the good work being done
by conservatives at F.I.R.E. and for the most part is a sober
assessment of government sponsored student loan indentured servitude.
The "fever swamps of the left" quote diminishes what would otherwise be a
powerfully objective assessment of student aid policy.
Jesus and the Death Penalty
This point is very well taken. For the safety of the outside world,
prison confinement seems to be sufficient. But if prison guards and
other inmates are in serious danger from determined offenders inside the
prison, there may be grounds for a life sanction in response to
violence committed or attempted there. No one should enjoy exercise of
the ultimate act of self-defense, but the State is responsible for the
safety of those guards and other inmates. See the reasoning at https://www.ewtn.com/expert/an...
One has to wonder whether the Gospel beckons the heart more than the
reasoning mind. The priority of heart over reason would seem to be the
point of what sounded like cannibalism at the end of John Chapter 6.
Contrary to FreeMan's assertion, it's not clear that Jesus endorsed
Roman justice. What is clear is that the forgiving Lord commanded us to
follow HIM and HIS ways; the fledgling first century people of The Way
were singled out for how they did not conform to prevailing conventions
of disregard for the downtrodden and for the growing duty to worship of
Caesar as a deity.
An ego centered mind intends for the "bad" thief to be in eternal suffering, and then proclaims it as true. Why proclaim as true what is unknowable? Why not simply follow Christ and leave open the status of the bad thief's soul. If the good thief interceded on the other's behalf, would our Lord refuse him? Why not implore all of us to pray for the soul of the bad thief. Isn't that what a follower of Jesus would do?
If today's people of The Way are allowed to contribute to the formation of state policy, then of course they are entitled to expose the disconnect in the state first demonstrating that the condemned can be confined for several years while the reasoning of justice exhausts its due process duties, and then the state insists on execution rather than continued confinement. Clemency is an imperative for a follower of Christ. The point is to sanction and confine the offender, and to collectively carry the burden of his crimes without further bloodshed.
People who are not followers of Christ are reminded that the whole point of this article was to explore capital punishment from a Christian perspective. People who are serious about being followers of Christ need to give this view respectful consideration.
An ego centered mind intends for the "bad" thief to be in eternal suffering, and then proclaims it as true. Why proclaim as true what is unknowable? Why not simply follow Christ and leave open the status of the bad thief's soul. If the good thief interceded on the other's behalf, would our Lord refuse him? Why not implore all of us to pray for the soul of the bad thief. Isn't that what a follower of Jesus would do?
If today's people of The Way are allowed to contribute to the formation of state policy, then of course they are entitled to expose the disconnect in the state first demonstrating that the condemned can be confined for several years while the reasoning of justice exhausts its due process duties, and then the state insists on execution rather than continued confinement. Clemency is an imperative for a follower of Christ. The point is to sanction and confine the offender, and to collectively carry the burden of his crimes without further bloodshed.
People who are not followers of Christ are reminded that the whole point of this article was to explore capital punishment from a Christian perspective. People who are serious about being followers of Christ need to give this view respectful consideration.
Comedian Ron White likes to throw out a line about how, while other
states ponder the merits of capital punishment, his state of Texas was
putting in an express lane. If that's not fast enough, maybe you could
advocate for giving the arresting officer the OK to off the guy, but
only if the officer's real sure and promises to post it on youtube.
Obamacare’s Doom
I certainly hope the shrewd and self assured Justice Roberts can see
that this law he was against before he was for, has resulted in
unprecedented disregard of law, and turns the Presidency into a
dictatorship that suspends, extends and disregards laws as it sees fit.
If he loves the rule of law, it's time to trash the ACA because if
Congress can't get something as simple as the origination clause right,
then it's bill is highly suspect as very bad law.
Foreign Policy: From Bad to None
Hating the Left means we only get ourselves to vote GOP (with the
added bonus of poor turnout). Dole, McCain and Romney did not lose
because they avoided contempt and disrespect. Ron Reagan was
spectacularly genial on a personal level, and had the brains and the
guts to eviscerate policy positions of the Left (as does Dr. Hanson in
his article). Superiority complex conservatives dripping with contempt
for people who voted Left resurrect Goldwater, not Reagan. They should
nominate Mark Levin for office and see how that candidacy goes.
Bravisimo! This is precisely the kind of rhetoric and tone with which
the Right can win elections. Appeal to the center with calm, assertive
understanding while avoiding disrespect and contempt.
Democrat Center Folds
"At this juncture it doesn't really matter what 'the party of stupid'
does. The bottom line is that the voters from this diverse coalition
who keep these democrat slugs in power are driven by sheer ignorance,
unbridled greed or naked lust for power."
Mhack, I think your statement unwittingly holds the secret to the left's success. And I think you, and I and Clarice share much of the responsibility for this predicament. The center-left alliance is made stronger when conservatives use all their oxygen to complain and blame. Like so many other gifted bloggers on the right, Clarice is stuck in complain and blame mode. We fail to display a healthy respect in our disagreement, and we double down with contempt for the left rather than demonstrate how conservatives are using their creative freedom to provide solutions of any kind, large or small.
We are not going to attract the center into a center-right alliance by calling them ignorant, or by indulging in contempt for the positions previously supported by independents. We need to project like Daniel Hannan, but we look and sound more like an embittered Barry Goldwater.
I strongly urge conservatives to absorb THE RIGHTEOUS MIND by Jonathan Haidt and appreciate how pointless our reasoning is when our postures repulse voters intuitively.
If conservatives want to win elections, we have to appeal to both the center and the right. This week Victor Davis Hanson climbed out of complain and blame mode to write an appealing piece on foreign policy, see http://www.nationalreview.com/.... Dr. Hanson takes a great approach and tone. He starts the conversation with common ground, and then has a sober but respectful conversation on the alternative courses available to recent leaders and the consequences from the paths chosen. It projects a calm, informed, respectful and trustworthy leadership -- and it's 100% whine free.
When independents sample conservative blogs, this is the kind of writing that should be prominent.
Mhack, I think your statement unwittingly holds the secret to the left's success. And I think you, and I and Clarice share much of the responsibility for this predicament. The center-left alliance is made stronger when conservatives use all their oxygen to complain and blame. Like so many other gifted bloggers on the right, Clarice is stuck in complain and blame mode. We fail to display a healthy respect in our disagreement, and we double down with contempt for the left rather than demonstrate how conservatives are using their creative freedom to provide solutions of any kind, large or small.
We are not going to attract the center into a center-right alliance by calling them ignorant, or by indulging in contempt for the positions previously supported by independents. We need to project like Daniel Hannan, but we look and sound more like an embittered Barry Goldwater.
I strongly urge conservatives to absorb THE RIGHTEOUS MIND by Jonathan Haidt and appreciate how pointless our reasoning is when our postures repulse voters intuitively.
If conservatives want to win elections, we have to appeal to both the center and the right. This week Victor Davis Hanson climbed out of complain and blame mode to write an appealing piece on foreign policy, see http://www.nationalreview.com/.... Dr. Hanson takes a great approach and tone. He starts the conversation with common ground, and then has a sober but respectful conversation on the alternative courses available to recent leaders and the consequences from the paths chosen. It projects a calm, informed, respectful and trustworthy leadership -- and it's 100% whine free.
When independents sample conservative blogs, this is the kind of writing that should be prominent.
Then Came Dave
Excellent suggestion as to the source of DL's appeal. My take is
that his overwhelming levels of self-loathing contribute to highly
developed skills in self-avoidance and transference. DL is never more
awkward than when he attempts sincerity. And he was never more exposed
as incapable of intimate fidelity as when he glibly sexualized and
demeaned the Palins' minor daughters.
Justice Department says no to ‘strip down’ of tax lien in Chapter 13
Great discussion. SCOTUS shot down Ryan's petition on March 24, 2014.
Mark30339
a year ago
Mark30339
a year ago
Mark30339
clarice Feldman
a year ago
Mark30339
a year ago
Brandeis U. Decides Against Honor for Islam Critic
Here we go again with prejudice and bigotry against people of color
who don't conform to politically correct thinking. Could the academic
elite please reduce their orthodoxy to writing and publish it in a
little red book so we can all know how to get our minds right?
America’s New Anti-Strategy
Dr. Hanson and I will probably not agree on immigration but we
certainly both endorse conservatism. In this article he takes a great
approach and tone. If conservatives want to win elections, we have to
appeal to both the center and the right. Accordingly, he starts the
conversation with common ground, and then has a sober but respectful
conversation on the alternative courses available to recent leaders and
the consequences from the paths chosen. It projects a calm, informed,
respectful and trustworthy leadership -- and it's 100% whine free.
State of Disunion
Hello Clarice, your posts are consistently packed with remarkable and
useful information. But the domains of AT, FrontPage, Powerline and
the like are still too obscure to believe that these seemingly published
words fall from your lips to the electorate's ear. Instead these
words, and their contemptuous tone, bounce around like an echo that
reinforces an arrogant contempt within the Right for those who don't
embrace the presumed superiority of conservative thinking. This tone
won't be getting us any landslide victories.
Clarice has done a solid compilation of posts found elsewhere in the
conservative blogosphere. Maybe she should call it "Clarice Hears a
Who." How does re-announcing these facts on AT translate into a savvy
electorate poised to reject Hilary in 2016? Hearing these things over
and over in our obscure, conservative echochambers actually makes us
less patient, more strident and more disrespectful of independents.
Clarice calls them "low information voters" -- I guess because they
don't read AT, FrontPage or Powerline. If we want to win elections,
then we need to become calm, thoughtful people who court independents
with confidence and respect.
Bridge(gat)ing the Democrats' Culture of Corruption
From my memory, this piece is the biggest touchdown dance Clarice has
ever posted, and once the glow of this gloating fades we have to ask .
. . what touchdown did our team score?
Leland Yee, the Kochs, and the Press
Look. Publicly traded Disney owns ABC. Publicly traded Comcast owns
NBC. And CBS is publicly traded. If the Right wants these entities to
be more fair and balanced, they need to buy a majority of shares and
attract journalists like Tapper and Atkinson who pose tough questions
for everybody. Laments over how media is unbalanced, unfair,
inconsistent and advocacy driven get us no where -- that innocence was
lost in the election of 1800 between Adams and Jefferson.
Soylent Green Really Is People
I need days and weeks to mourn this callous disregard for human
dignity. And pronouncements of contempt for the persons and policies
responsible may make some of us feel better -- but they won't result in
an uplifting of internal dignity in the places where it is so
desperately low. The years of non-stop complaining from the Right over
social decline seems to be counterproductive. I wonder if we need to
say a lot less, and be present to set dignified examples a lot more.
Barry Goldwater versus the RINOs
I like to think I'm a conservative, and my views on smaller
government/bigger freedom make me a lock. But the Right's odd quest for
purity and orthodoxy ends up with circular firing squads. For example,
if I have principled objections to deadly force when other options are
present and to capital punishment, I'm labeled a RINO. When I advocate
for the children of illegals on humanitarian grounds, and criticize the
ad hoc enforcement of a completely unworkable immigration law, I'm
called a concerned troll.
I think medicare, medicaid, food stamps, affirmative action, student loans, earmarks, farm subsidies, charitable deduction limits, and deficit spending have morphed into huge, and nearly uncontrollable mistakes -- but they are now as American as Apple Pie. This nostalgic wish for the return of a straight talking, entitlement canceling Barry Goldwater borders on mental illness.
We can't improve squat if we can't win elections. When people like the highly intelligent, repulsively snarky Mark Levin stand for election in toss-up districts and their conservative purism wins, then I'll endorse the author's Goldwater premise. In the meantime, I'll be a big tent Scott Walker republican who goes out of his way to persistently welcome all who are troubled by the Left. Rather than being the party of Goldwater purists, let's be the smaller government party of Welcome and win some elections.
I think medicare, medicaid, food stamps, affirmative action, student loans, earmarks, farm subsidies, charitable deduction limits, and deficit spending have morphed into huge, and nearly uncontrollable mistakes -- but they are now as American as Apple Pie. This nostalgic wish for the return of a straight talking, entitlement canceling Barry Goldwater borders on mental illness.
We can't improve squat if we can't win elections. When people like the highly intelligent, repulsively snarky Mark Levin stand for election in toss-up districts and their conservative purism wins, then I'll endorse the author's Goldwater premise. In the meantime, I'll be a big tent Scott Walker republican who goes out of his way to persistently welcome all who are troubled by the Left. Rather than being the party of Goldwater purists, let's be the smaller government party of Welcome and win some elections.
Discussion on
Philly.com
5 comments
All eyes on NFL commissioner
Some of us will remember October 2009 when Irsay and Goodell publicly
announced that they would not allow Rush Limbaugh to be a co-owner of
the St. Louis Rams. Yes, Rush's views are hard hitting and irreverent,
but they certainly pack more substance than the malicious fantasies
constantly spun by POTUS, the Speaker and the Senate Majority Leader. At
the tip of the iceberg: remember how we "cling to our guns and
religion, " how we "need to pass it to see what's in it," and how all
the Obamacare hardship stories "are lies, all lies." My point is that
the NFL clearly has plenty of stooges pretending to be virtuous -- but
because their leadership leans so hard left, they silence opposing views
in the name of their pretended virtue.
Uncontested and Contested Arrivals
Great article. But House investigations are so easily thwarted --
especially when the army of investigative reporters that descended on
Palin's Alaska are now AWOL (as the joke goes, not only are they unable
to find a scandal in the Obama administration, they can't find their
hind-quarters with two hands).
I think the radical, long-ball play is for the GOP to boycott federal offices and throw all their resources into gaining more majorities in the States. The Left is directing a series of cascading train-wrecks and they have needed to blame their faults on conservatives. It is better that we withdraw in advance, and warn of the coming calamity. If the electorate is allowed to be in denial about the folly of their choice in 2008 and 2012, they will continue to believe that conservatives are the reason Washington keeps under-delivering on all the entitlements it has over-promised.
Again, I said this was radical (it's also AynRandian). I know the barbarians on the Left will try to raid and ransack -- but aren't they doing that already? A principled refusal to participate in federal politics for 2 years will expose the Left and should pay dividends in 2016. Especially when the States are shown to have prospered under GOP leadership.
I think the radical, long-ball play is for the GOP to boycott federal offices and throw all their resources into gaining more majorities in the States. The Left is directing a series of cascading train-wrecks and they have needed to blame their faults on conservatives. It is better that we withdraw in advance, and warn of the coming calamity. If the electorate is allowed to be in denial about the folly of their choice in 2008 and 2012, they will continue to believe that conservatives are the reason Washington keeps under-delivering on all the entitlements it has over-promised.
Again, I said this was radical (it's also AynRandian). I know the barbarians on the Left will try to raid and ransack -- but aren't they doing that already? A principled refusal to participate in federal politics for 2 years will expose the Left and should pay dividends in 2016. Especially when the States are shown to have prospered under GOP leadership.
Drag a Hundred Dollar Bill through a School of Journalism
With the plethora of rants we have on the conservative side, this is
one of the better ones. Still, we need to move beyond this endless
feeling sorry for ourselves phase and project the calm, secure,
respectful, appealing and competent leadership our country desperately
needs. We are falling way short of the mark. I suggest we stop the
victimhood, that we present more like UK legislator, Daniel Hannan, and
that we substitute the whining for activities that actually help people.
Bob Costas seeing Red. Or is it Dorian Gray?
Great take on Bob and his limitless ego. The 1945 version of Dorian Gray is a great flick, see http://dvd.netflix.com/Movie/T...
Comedy as a Weapon of the Left
The steering of public opinion works, and political cartoons are not
just as American as apple pie, they probably pre-date American apple
pie. The dominant media will always have the advantage in this game,
and whining doesn't change that reality. The Right has to take great
care to avoid being branded as advocates of government shutdowns or of
cut-offs to needy persons, or being seen as scolding, uncaring
know-it-alls with superiority complexes.
Rather than complain about losing elections due to "low information voters," we could announce to the electorate our respectful disagreement, and continue to advocate smaller government. It is easy to find examples of how big, one size fits all policy hurts far more than it helps, and how costly it is. We need to shake off the media disadvantage, and remain calm, assertive and ready to lead with policy changes to expand private enterprise and curtail government.
The Right's problem isn't so much the unflattering comedy, it's that we seem so desperate, scattered and unready for leadership.
Rather than complain about losing elections due to "low information voters," we could announce to the electorate our respectful disagreement, and continue to advocate smaller government. It is easy to find examples of how big, one size fits all policy hurts far more than it helps, and how costly it is. We need to shake off the media disadvantage, and remain calm, assertive and ready to lead with policy changes to expand private enterprise and curtail government.
The Right's problem isn't so much the unflattering comedy, it's that we seem so desperate, scattered and unready for leadership.
Ms. Harris announces that the Evans book corrects the history on
McCarthy and debunks the use of this name with baseless smear campaigns.
Amazon comments on the book (see http://www.amazon.com/review/R... are enough to merit another look at McCarthy and to suspend the knee-jerk ridicule that Emmy is launching here.
Phil Robertson Won't Shutup and the Media Hates It
In the 1980s I was shocked to see people interpret current events to
announce that God sent AIDS to punish Gays. We've come a long way from
there, and Phil Robertson is a welcome relief. Fornication is so
common and so accepted today, but fornicators don't organize act up
campaigns to discredit those who call the behavior a failing under
Christian ideals -- neither do the adulterers or the swindlers. But
gays and abortionists are so insecure about their behavior that they
have to reinvent morality to be a public relations contest. Why is it
that intolerance is never about mistreatment of those who advocate
Christian principles?
Pope Francis, Thomas Jefferson, and Capitalism
Frank Ryan's piece is exceptional and quite a welcome departure in
tone from the average AT post. There is no substitute for capitalism,
especially American capitalism -- but so much is spent on public
relations because so much is still being covered up. I commend readers
to visit www.globalwitness.com
and review how corporate greed in the West helps despots in small
countries plunder resources and leave populations destitute. This is not
a think tank trying to install soviet-style command economies -- they
simply advocate for full disclosure on the huge and secret payoffs that
enable these plunders.
For Those of You Who Always Suspected Me of Being a RINO...
"What I believe we should do is the same thing the House of Representatives did, the same thing the House courageously did, which was last Friday the House of Representatives voted to fund every aspect of the Federal Government--every bit of it, including parts they disagree with--except for ObamaCare."
Cruz was using his filibuster to fully encourage the House posture. The Cruz apologists seem to agree that shutdown was a mistake, they just want to be in denial about Ted's endorsement for the disastrous House tactics. The left wanted a shutdown, the dominant media was ready to blame the GOP, and the GOP needed to avoid reinforcing the perception that it is a spiteful shutdown party. Cruz and his supporters would be more credible if they owned this blunder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















That Scandalous Archbishop